<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HTML Editor Reviews &#187; 2.5-2.9 Stars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/category/25-stars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca</link>
	<description>Reviews and Discussion of (X)HTML Coding Tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review: HateML Pro 1.1</title>
		<link>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2007/07/22/review-hateml-pro-11/</link>
		<comments>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2007/07/22/review-hateml-pro-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2.5-2.9 Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2007/07/22/review-hateml-pro-11/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I&#8217;m not quite sure how to even pronounce the name of this editor &#8212; is it supposed to sound like H.T.M.L. or HATE em el? I guess it doesn&#8217;t matter because I won&#8217;t be using it anyway. Ok, that&#8217;s a bit harsh, but it&#8217;s also true. HateML doesn&#8217;t bring anything new to the HTML [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/wp-content/photos/hateml.png" width="341" height="47" alt="hateml" class="left" />Well, I&#8217;m not quite sure how to even pronounce the name of this editor &#8212; is it supposed to sound like H.T.M.L. or HATE em el? I guess it doesn&#8217;t matter because I won&#8217;t be using it anyway. Ok, that&#8217;s a bit harsh, but it&#8217;s also true. HateML doesn&#8217;t bring anything new to the HTML editor scene, and what it does bring doesn&#8217;t eclipse what&#8217;s already out there. Same old, same old. While there isn&#8217;t necessarily a lot of room for innovation in the editor world, there certainly is <em>some</em> room. Look at <a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2007/05/27/review-coda-10/">Coda</a>, for example. Or, if innovation isn&#8217;t your bag, then at least grab some of the best features from other editors, as <a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/12/01/first-look-e-text-editor/">e</a> has done, giving Windows users <a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/05/24/review-textmate/">TextMate</a> snippets and bundles. Don&#8217;t get me wrong: HateML isn&#8217;t a bad editor; it just doesn&#8217;t stand out in an incredibly crowded market.</p>

<p>(...)<br/>Read the rest of <a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2007/07/22/review-hateml-pro-11/">Review: HateML Pro 1.1</a> (260 words)</p>
<hr />
<p><small>© Eric for <a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca">HTML Editor Reviews</a>. |
<a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2007/07/22/review-hateml-pro-11/">Permalink</a> |
<a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2007/07/22/review-hateml-pro-11/#comments">17 comments</a> |
Add to
<a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2007/07/22/review-hateml-pro-11/&title=Review: HateML Pro 1.1">del.icio.us</a></small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2007/07/22/review-hateml-pro-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Adobe GoLive CS2</title>
		<link>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/09/07/review-adobe-golive-cs2/</link>
		<comments>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/09/07/review-adobe-golive-cs2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 04:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2.5-2.9 Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/09/07/review-adobe-golive-cs2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d never really given Adobe GoLive much thought. Sure, it came bundled with CS2, but I already had a couple editors to choose from. On paper, GoLive CS2 is an amazing-looking product, full of great features. In practice, however, the program falls a bit short. To be fair, I&#8217;m not exactly GoLive&#8217;s target market &#8212; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/wp-content/photos/golive_logo.png" width="72" height="72" alt="golive logo" class="left" />I&#8217;d never really given Adobe GoLive much thought. Sure, it came bundled with CS2, but I already had a couple editors to choose from. On paper, GoLive CS2 is an amazing-looking product, full of great features. In practice, however, the program falls a bit short. To be fair, I&#8217;m not exactly GoLive&#8217;s target market &#8212; I prefer hand-coding to WYSIWYG editing. At the same time, the product could offer more of a balance (the way Dreamweaver does) between visual editing and source editing.</p>

<p>(...)<br/>Read the rest of <a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/09/07/review-adobe-golive-cs2/">Review: Adobe GoLive CS2</a> (427 words)</p>
<hr />
<p><small>© Eric for <a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca">HTML Editor Reviews</a>. |
<a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/09/07/review-adobe-golive-cs2/">Permalink</a> |
<a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/09/07/review-adobe-golive-cs2/#comments">11 comments</a> |
Add to
<a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/09/07/review-adobe-golive-cs2/&title=Review: Adobe GoLive CS2">del.icio.us</a></small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/09/07/review-adobe-golive-cs2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Bluefish 1.0</title>
		<link>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/08/18/review-bluefish-10/</link>
		<comments>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/08/18/review-bluefish-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2.5-2.9 Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/08/18/review-bluefish-10/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the reasons I wanted to set up Linux on my computer again was to take a closer look at Bluefish, the free, GTK-based editor. I&#8217;d tried a beta version a year or so ago, more for fun than anything, and I remembered it being a fairly pleasing experience. So, I was excited to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/wp-content/photos/bluefish_1.png" width="72" height="63" alt="bluefish 1" class="left" />One of the reasons I wanted to set up Linux on my computer again was to take a closer look at Bluefish, the free, GTK-based editor. I&#8217;d tried a beta version a year or so ago, more for fun than anything, and I remembered it being a fairly pleasing experience. So, I was excited to try it again, this time for the sake of proper evaluation. The result? I&#8217;m still excited. Not because It&#8217;s made me want to switch over to Linux, but because of its potential.</p>

<p>(...)<br/>Read the rest of <a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/08/18/review-bluefish-10/">Review: Bluefish 1.0</a> (415 words)</p>
<hr />
<p><small>© Eric for <a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca">HTML Editor Reviews</a>. |
<a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/08/18/review-bluefish-10/">Permalink</a> |
<a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/08/18/review-bluefish-10/#comments">10 comments</a> |
Add to
<a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/08/18/review-bluefish-10/&title=Review: Bluefish 1.0">del.icio.us</a></small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/08/18/review-bluefish-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: AceHTML Pro 6</title>
		<link>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/05/08/review-acehtml-pro-6/</link>
		<comments>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/05/08/review-acehtml-pro-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 23:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2.5-2.9 Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/05/08/review-acehtml-pro-6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Admittedly, I was rooting for AceHTML Pro 6 since I discovered it was created by a Canadian company – the first HTML editor I&#8217;ve found that is. I evaluated the 30-day demo of AceHTML Pro, and while it offers many of the options included in other editors, I found the demo itself a bit buggy. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admittedly, I was rooting for AceHTML Pro 6 since I discovered it was created by a Canadian company – the first HTML editor I&#8217;ve found that is. I evaluated the 30-day demo of AceHTML Pro, and while it offers many of the options included in other editors, I found the demo itself a bit buggy. For example, the 30 day limit never counted down, making me wonder if the demo would actually expire; as well, some of my settings reset each time I started the program (code helper delay, for instance), which was rather annoying. AceHTML Pro does, however, contain some features I haven&#8217;t seen anywhere else, including a To Do List manager and the ability to highlight code (as if with a highlighter pen).</p>

<p>(...)<br/>Read the rest of <a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/05/08/review-acehtml-pro-6/">Review: AceHTML Pro 6</a> (353 words)</p>
<hr />
<p><small>© Eric for <a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca">HTML Editor Reviews</a>. |
<a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/05/08/review-acehtml-pro-6/">Permalink</a> |
<a href="http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/05/08/review-acehtml-pro-6/#comments">69 comments</a> |
Add to
<a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/05/08/review-acehtml-pro-6/&title=Review: AceHTML Pro 6">del.icio.us</a></small></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/05/08/review-acehtml-pro-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

