Comments on: Review: WeBuilder 2006 http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/04/19/webuilder-2006/ Reviews and Discussion of (X)HTML Coding Tools Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:56:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Bola Owoade http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/04/19/webuilder-2006/#comment-31055 Bola Owoade Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:48:20 +0000 http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/04/19/webuilder-2006/#comment-31055 <p>I've been using it for some years now and is the best Web Editor i've used. It's worth much more than it costs. The only problem with Blumenthals is that their customer service is very poor. For instance i lost my install key and emailed them for a replacement about 6 weeks ago. To date i have got no reply from them. Nonetheless their excellent product and it's affordability will still make me patronise them.</p> I’ve been using it for some years now and is the best Web Editor i’ve used. It’s worth much more than it costs. The only problem with Blumenthals is that their customer service is very poor. For instance i lost my install key and emailed them for a replacement about 6 weeks ago. To date i have got no reply from them. Nonetheless their excellent product and it’s affordability will still make me patronise them.

]]> By: Steve M. http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/04/19/webuilder-2006/#comment-23372 Steve M. Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:42:16 +0000 http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/04/19/webuilder-2006/#comment-23372 <p>I have used WYSIWYG editors (NetObjects Fusion, Adobe GoLive) up until I discovered WeBuilder 2008. Since then I've been doing all my work with WeBuilder and actually learning XHTML, CSS, and Javascript for the first time.</p> I have used WYSIWYG editors (NetObjects Fusion, Adobe GoLive) up until I discovered WeBuilder 2008. Since then I’ve been doing all my work with WeBuilder and actually learning XHTML, CSS, and Javascript for the first time.

]]> By: Nori Silverrage http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/04/19/webuilder-2006/#comment-23219 Nori Silverrage Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:05:02 +0000 http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/04/19/webuilder-2006/#comment-23219 <p>@Yuri</p> <p>Not having WYSIWYG is not a fatal flaw. Its not a flaw at all. It just adds bloat and screws up code. I for one will never use a WYSIWYG editor and I think a lot of web developers would agree with me.</p> <p>Anyway, it is a awesome editor and I just keep finding more and more stuff to like about it. Plus they keep adding more features and actually listen to users and what they want.</p> @Yuri

Not having WYSIWYG is not a fatal flaw. Its not a flaw at all. It just adds bloat and screws up code. I for one will never use a WYSIWYG editor and I think a lot of web developers would agree with me.

Anyway, it is a awesome editor and I just keep finding more and more stuff to like about it. Plus they keep adding more features and actually listen to users and what they want.

]]> By: Mohsin http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/04/19/webuilder-2006/#comment-22624 Mohsin Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:21:15 +0000 http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/04/19/webuilder-2006/#comment-22624 <p>Agreed. It's just about the perfect editor.</p> <p>Been using it for 3 years and now and I continue to be in love with it. ;)</p> Agreed. It’s just about the perfect editor.

Been using it for 3 years and now and I continue to be in love with it. ;)

]]> By: Gorki http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/04/19/webuilder-2006/#comment-22110 Gorki Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:57:55 +0000 http://htmleditors.shadowboxcreative.ca/2006/04/19/webuilder-2006/#comment-22110 <p>ad Yuri,</p> <p>this is by design , no flaw :-) "WYSWYN (what you see is what you need)" ("invented" by homesite)</p> ad Yuri,

this is by design , no flaw :-) “WYSWYN (what you see is what you need)” (“invented” by homesite)

]]>